Sunday, December 16, 2012

Paper #1, Option #2


            Dramatic irony is a literary device used by play writers in order to give the audience a sense of knowledge and even an ability to apply emotions to a certain character and explain his or her actions before they even take place.  The idea of this irony is well developed in Sophocles’ Antigone, where multiple characters are depicted to have less knowledge than the audience, giving them a more helpless or even fate bound appeal to them.  Once a character, possibly a tragic hero, makes a choice, the audience knows exactly what is about to unfold while the characters are still quite clueless.  The use of dramatic irony adds to the effect that the characters are destined to act upon something while the audience is well aware of what is going to happen, therefore, Sophocles is successful in creating an ironic setting for his characters who find themselves falling into their own demises.
            
            Throughout all of Antigone, Sophocles implements a multitude of ironic situations in which either Creon or Antigone are both in danger of making mistakes that they are blind to.  Creon, by himself, is an extremely controversial character.  He is both blinded by pride and power, and even though the audience knows that there will be bloodshed for his actions, Creon is completely oblivious to it all.  Even when he wants to send Antigone to the cave where she commits suicide, he does not understand the consequences that that may bring him.  Imagine that he is sending the fiancé of his only son to her death, if anything, that should send up some sort of warning in his mind.  Other than that, Sophocles depicts him as an old man who has finally got what he did not want, the throne.  Something that Creon is not known for is his small role in Oedipus Rex, even though he was Oedipus’ brother and “son,” as Oedipus was exiled, “[Creon] grants his wish [to succeed] and takes the throne in his stead” (Wikipedia.org 1).  It was not like Creon had a choice in the matter, without him, there would be no King of Thebes and the city would have been torn to shreds by the civil war that was going on. 

On top of all of his faults and failings, Creon could never resist defying a source of power, whether it be fate or any prophets that he may see fit.  While arguing about what to do with Antigone, Creon states that him and his son, Haemon, “will know [the truth] better than the prophets” (Sophocles 680).  How ironic can this be? He clearly states that he has better vision than those who can see the past, present, and future, all while he is plotting to kill his niece and allow both his son and wife to commit suicide, whether they be accidents or not, still they will be lost.  Where does Creon go wrong in his plight to be the best leader he could possibly be?  It all starts with his edict.  The law he passed to disallow anyone to bury Polyneices’ body, someone who used to be his nephew and a great warrior of Thebes, turned rouge after losing the rights to the throne.  Creon goes against family code and tradition in order to put this in place, and above all, he does this not only to his own nephew, but ruins any chances that Antigone has to be at peace with both of her deceased brothers.  This then defined him and his fate was sealed, even though he did not know, the people know everything that will happen to him and his loved ones; they will all perish because of his selfish and impulsive act of placing such an absurd law in place.

Antigone, the girl who fed the fire that was already lit by Creon’s idiocy and pride.  Because of her actions after Creon pushing the first domino, she let the rest all fall down behind her.  Antigone being a martyr, probably not, she may have buried Polyneices, but she definitely did not mean to stir up such a ruckus after doing so.  Most likely she wanted to just get her final good deed to him before all hope was lost and she was caught in the crossfire of something much bigger than herself.  Even though she died for what she may have believed in, she died because of her own stupidity and pride.  Even though Creon may have been the one who blew the cinders to kindle the fire, Antigone had to come and pour gasoline all over it.  Yes, she did the right thing by her brother. Yes, she did take all the blame and not lay even a single bit of it on her sister, Ismene.  And yes, she did die to prove the point that not just one man should rule a whole city-state.  But, it was doubtable that it was her intention to bring such chaos in the wake of her suicide.  Even though the people knew that she was dead the second she dusted that corpse with sand, she was fated to become the so-called “martyr” many people believe her to be.  After she plans to bury Polyneices, she even tells her sister to “shout it out! [and she would] hate [her] still worse for silence” (Sophocles 99-100) thus defining her personality, bold and very out there.  Her main goal, as stated, is to prove that she can do what she wants with her brother’s body, even if a big bad king is in her way, she could still fight and be the woman that stands up to the tyrant.  She even wanted to die, she could care less if Creon had spared her or not, she was game for life or death, yet nonetheless; she was going to die any way that the situation was handled.

On the contrary, there are a large number of places that point in the opposite direction, to show she may be a martyr, and that she may have known all along that she was going to die.  Not as blinded as one may think, Antigone say that she is “led along the road ready before [her]” and her “fate claims no tears” (Sophocles 923-926).  Antigone is a definite believer in fate; she knows that something will happen to her, yet she is quite vague in her description of her so-called “fate.”  Even though she may be somewhat of a radical, she does give many valid points to why she does what she does, even though Antigone may be slightly out of her mind, she has a valid point.  Sophocles, among many other Greek philosophers and authors at the time, were questioning the systems by which their governments and all of their political figureheads were based.  It is one ruler, a monarch or even a demi-god in some cases, that is practically worshipped by the people and that ruler’s word was like the words of the gods.  Therefore, they were always followed and anything they said was law, for example, Creon’s edict. Antigone is the symbolic representation of all of those people who questioned the government.  She is the one part that keeps the gears from turning and the people’s voice that shouts “Enough!” to the false prophets and outlandish rulers of the time.  And by that fact alone, Antigone may in fact be a martyr.

Both Antigone and Creon serve their purposes in Antigone, being led blindly into the unknown and the vicious thing we call the future.  Their fates were both sealed from the beginning once the edict was put in place, but the beauty of it all is that the dramatic irony is defined as what Creon and Antigone embodied all along, the conflict between monarch and freedom.  Without either character, this play would not have had the same effect on the people as it did those thousands of years ago, and maybe, without plays like Antigone, we may not have the world as it is today. 


Works Cited
"Creon." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 22 Oct. 2012. Web. 23 Oct. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creon>.

Sophocles, Alison Booth, and Kelly J. Mays. Antigone. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2011. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment